The Contentious Debate: Recognizing a Palestinian State vs. Ignoring Taiwan
This week, several liberal democracies at the United Nations General Assembly have moved towards recognizing a Palestinian state. This development, gaining momentum after the October 7th attacks, has sparked debate, particularly concerning the contrast with the international community's stance on Taiwan. Critics argue that this recognition overlooks the current realities of Palestinian governance while simultaneously neglecting a thriving democracy.
The Case Against Palestinian Statehood
Arguments against recognizing a Palestinian state center on the lack of established statehood criteria. According to the article, no current Palestinian entity meets the Montevideo Convention's definition, which includes a permanent population, defined territory, a functioning government, and the capacity to engage in international relations. The article cites the divided control between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza as evidence of governmental instability.
Additionally, the author contests the claim to a permanent population due to the UN's classification of a significant portion of the population as refugees. The article emphasizes the limitations imposed on the Palestinian Authority by the Oslo Accords, highlighting Israel's control over security, taxation, and border crossings. The chaotic transfer of power from the Palestinian Authority to Hamas in Gaza is also offered as proof against their ability to maintain a unified government.
Taiwan: A Contrasting Example
In stark contrast, the article positions Taiwan, or the Republic of China (ROC), as a viable state fulfilling both Weberian and international legal criteria. Despite limited international recognition, Taiwan possesses a defined territory, a permanent population, and an established government with a monopoly on the use of force. Its democratic transition in the 1990s further strengthens its claim as a free and stable nation.
Furthermore, Taiwan demonstrates the capacity to establish relations with other states, though often facing diplomatic obstacles due to pressure from China. The author underlines Taiwan's strong human rights record, commitment to green energy, and active support for democracy promotion internationally, exemplified by its support for Ukraine.
The Moral Dilemma and Implications
The piece highlights the inconsistency of democracies readily engaging with the Palestinian Authority while shunning Taiwan in deference to China. The author suggests that recognizing a Palestinian state could be seen as a reward for the October 7th attacks, while isolating Taiwan is perceived as an act of cowardice in the face of Chinese retaliation. The piece concludes by urging democratic leaders to engage with Taiwan before prioritizing efforts to bring peace to the Middle East, and that no Palestinian entity qualifies for any definition of statehood, and no definition of good applies to any Palestinian government.
| Criteria | Palestinian Authority | Taiwan (ROC) |
|---|---|---|
| Defined Territory | Disputed, lacking clear borders | Defined territory on Taiwan and surrounding islands |
| Permanent Population | Challenged by refugee status | Yes |
| Government | Divided, limited control | Stable, democratic |
| Capacity to Enter Relations | Limited by Israeli control | Limited by Chinese influence |
